Share via Email A superior writer … George Orwell in the s. Encouraged by a woman who seems to represent the political and sexual freedom of the pre-revolutionary era and with whom he sleeps in an ancient house that is one of the few manifestations of a former worldhe writes down his thoughts of rebellion — perhaps rather imprudently — as a hour clock ticks in his grim, lonely flat. In the end, the system discovers both the man and the woman, and after a period of physical and mental trauma the protagonist discovers he loves the state that has oppressed him throughout, and betrays his fellow rebels. The story is intended as a warning against and a prediction of the natural conclusions of totalitarianism.
Comment Mar 23, A Comparative Analysis of We and A book of high intellect and metaphor, We would prove to be a lasting and universal novel that dissected the relatively fresh contemporarily speaking Bolshevik Revolution.
Twenty-eight years later another dystopian novel appeared, this time written by the English intellectual George Orwell. However differences are apparent, most notably in the tone of the novels.
Conversely, Orwell seems convinced that revolution within the confines of a totalitarian state is not only impossible, but in the end simply another machination of the state. This paper will seek to compare the two novels, focusing on the differences and similarities found within their depictions of sex as a revolutionary construct; within their use of history as a controlling mechanism; within the states abject rejection of the artist as heretic; and finally within the limitations used to ultimately exercise the complete control that both the One State and Oceania so desire.
This analysis will synthesize both books into a cohesive argument for dystopian science fiction as relevant political commentary. Free sexual expression is incompatible with the authoritarian regimes of the Benefactor and Big Brother.
This is in contrast to the historic state of generations past, which left sexual life and procreation uncontrolled.
Sex is de-naturalized and rationalized in order to remove as much of its subversive potential as possible. Sex is similarly regulated within Oceania. Members of the Party live within the confines of strict sexual control.
Peter Stansky San Fransisco: Freemen and Company, Mirra Ginsburg New York: EOS HarperCollins, This regulation of the female sex drive within is depicted as the end result of extreme indoctrination, while little attempt to repress male sexuality is observed.
Chastity was as deeply ingrained in them as Party loyalty. By careful early conditioning, by games and cold water, by the rubbish that was drilled into them at school and in the Spies and the Youth League, by lectures, parades, songs, slogans and martial music, the natural feeling had been driven out of them.
Julia was acutely aware of this; she subverted the sexual repression of the Party through deviant sexual activity, and was fully cognizant of the personal political ramifications of her actions.
Sexual desire felt for another individual is shown to be, in and of itself, subversive. Penguin Books, There is no final one; revolutions are infinite. This is most evident with his discomfort at their first meeting, and his acute sexualisation of her at their second.
Peter Stansky, San Francisco: Routledge and Keegan Paul Ltd, However, while Julia specifically embodies revolution much like I, she is not an intellectual revolutionary.
Towards this point, it is important to note that female characters that embody the concept of revolutionary sexual desire are not allowed to exist within the confines of these societies. At the end of We, I is tortured and scheduled for execution.
By Peter Stansky San Francisco: Freeman and Company,16 Orwell, Similarly, Julia is not allowed to exist in her previous, highly sexualized capacity. Unlike I, she is left alive; however, in describing his encounter with Julia post-Ministry of Love, Winston likens her body previously associated with sexual desire and revolution to that of a corpse.
He remembered how once, after the explosion of a rocket bomb, he had helped to drag a corpse out of some ruins, and had been astonished not only by the incredible weight of the thing, but by its rigidity and awkwardness to handle, which made it seem more like stone than flesh.Early life.
Zamyatin was born in Lebedyan, Tambov Governorate, km ( mi) south of yunusemremert.com father was a Russian Orthodox priest and schoolmaster, and his mother a musician. In a essay, Zamyatin recalled, "You will see a very lonely child, without companions of his own age, on his stomach, over a book, or under the piano, on which his mother is playing Chopin.".
Literary scholars consider the Russian dystopian novel We, by Zamyatin, to have strongly influenced Nineteen Eighty-Four. ackground. We will write a custom essay sample on by George Orwell specifically for you.
for only $ $/page. Order now. Search. Related Essays.
In Tribune, 25 January , Gleb Struve amplified Orwell’s remarks on We and Zamyatin. May I add a few observations and facts to George Orwell’s article about Zamyatin’s We (Tribune, January 4) which, though, I agree, not a great book, is certainly both an important and an interesting work deserving to be known in this country?
Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as , is a dystopian novel published in by English author George Orwell. The novel is set in the year when most of the world population have become victims of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and propaganda..
In the novel, Great Britain ("Airstrip One") has become a province of a superstate named Oceania. May 31, · Orwell’s writing style, probably the most significant aspect of his work, is very different from Zamyatin’s. While Orwell’s writing is pithy and concise, Zamyatin’s work overflows with strange and wonderful metaphors, sometimes to the point of opacity.
Genesis, We, by Yevgeny Zamyatin, and Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell - The story of Adam and Eve has been told for many generations. One of its main focuses is .